← Blog
Dramatic Theory

Heat Conceit

Heat is a perfect example of character-engendered outcome. The plot doesn’t drive the characters; the characters drive the plot. Everything that happens is a function of what they believe and how they think.

Characters in this sense aren’t so much people as representations of thought processes. Physical representations of thoughts and algorithms of thinking.

“Who and what each character is, and sets up for himself, determines what happens to them. The conceit of the film is that the laws of cause and effect are what will befall you.” (Michael Mann)

By being diametrically symmetric, Neil and Vincent are locked in a spiral in which only one will survive. Not because of some plot shenanigans; because of the way they make decisions. Neil values independence above connection. Vincent chooses humanity. In this way Neil chooses fate, and Vincent chooses destiny.


HUMANITY

Heat becomes a story about the inescapability of humanity. Neil believes he can get away with it; it’s his attempt at obsessional omnipotence - the refusal to commit to anything other than the wish to determine reality. But as the actions of the drama lay out in all their bloody, precise glory, it is impossible to annul humanity as a human being. We all need connection. No one can truly survive by renouncing others, neither mentally nor physically. Heat expresses this insight through the metaphor of cinematic action.

Neil’s tragedy is that he attempts to undo his obsessional godlike attitude to existing and existence. He elects to be “spontaneous in his emotional commitment to Edie” (Mann). But nothing can erase Neil’s founding mental principle. At the last, Neil turns back to his grounding preconception: I must be independent of souls.

Neil never asks himself the most important question: Why? Why commit to that? To ensure a life of effortless, impeccable crime, sure. But why that? He comes close to that in the midpoint mutual interrogation coffee scene with Vincent. They even analyze each other’s dreams. But they don’t come close to answering the biggest question of all: Why? Their preconceptions in life remain in place, unperturbed, undismantled.


FATE & DESTINY

These trajectories of mentality lead them both to the film’s final image. Neil shot by Vincent; Vincent holding Neil’s hand as the life passes from him. Both surrounded by the concrete transitional brutality of LAX. One passing into death, the other into more life.

Neil was dead before the film began, both in himself and in the trajectory of his physical existence. He had refused his own humanity. Vincent would always go on to try and fail to be a human being.

As Mann clarifies,

“Most of what happens in our lives is what we have cause to have happen. And sometimes it’s impossible to undo the interlacing strings of causality.”